Speaker summary
⁠33%5 analyzed articles/videos204.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Socket results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Negativity Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 32.6% saturation with 92 hits. Analysis detected 361 faulty-reasoning hits from 204.667 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 18.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (20,069 of 28,364 speakers). This Socket is better (less manipulative) than 70.80% of the peer group.
Socket
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 204.667
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

29% percentile
025507510029.2% percentile
18.5% BS Score5 analyzed videos204.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 32.6%32.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 22.0%22.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 14.9%14.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 14.9%14.9%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 13.8%13.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 14.9%14.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 16.4%16.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 32.6%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 22.0%, sitewide 1.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 16.4%, sitewide 19.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 14.9%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 14.9%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 14.9%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos