Speaker summary
⁠66%1 analyzed article/video117 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Social Security trustees results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Anchoring Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Recency Bias as the most egregious example at 40.4% saturation with 47.25 hits. Analysis detected 161.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 117 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 28.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (15,462 of 28,364 speakers). This Social Security trustees is better (less manipulative) than 54.50% of the peer group.
Social Security trustees
Speaker details
Total words: 117
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

46% percentile
025507510045.5% percentile
28.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos117 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 40.4%40.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 26.9%26.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 23.1%23.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 23.1%23.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Recency Bias: Speaker 40.4%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 26.9%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 23.1%, sitewide 4.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 23.1%, sitewide 19.2%Recency BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos