Speaker summary
⁠60%1 analyzed article/video88 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Slaughter results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Slippery Slope, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 130 hits. Analysis detected 398 faulty-reasoning hits from 88 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 51% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (8,156 of 28,364 speakers). This Slaughter is worse (more manipulative) than 71.20% of the peer group.
Slaughter
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 88
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

71% percentile
025507510071.2% percentile
51.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos88 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 70.8%70.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 35.4%35.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 35.4%35.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 14.6%14.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Slippery Slope: Speaker 70.8%, sitewide 1.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 35.4%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 35.4%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos