Speaker summary
⁠41%4 analyzed articles/videos464.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Simone Biles results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 93 hits. Analysis detected 575.38 faulty-reasoning hits from 464.667 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠3% (27,454 of 28,200 speakers). This Simone Biles is better (less manipulative) than 97.40% of the peer group.
Simone Biles
Speaker details
Total words: 464.667
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

3% percentile
02550751002.6% percentile
5.1% BS Score4 analyzed videos464.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 8.0%8.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 11.3%11.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 6.3%6.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 3.3%3.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 4.4%4.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 6.2%6.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 11.8%11.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 3.3%3.3%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 0.0%Burden of Proof: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 0.4%Recency Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 0.6%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos