Speaker summary
⁠29%1 analyzed article/video91.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Simon Vaisse results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Loss Aversion, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 22 hits. Analysis detected 88 faulty-reasoning hits from 91.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 15.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠23% (21,933 of 28,364 speakers). This Simon Vaisse is better (less manipulative) than 77.30% of the peer group.
Simon Vaisse
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠23%Simon Vaisse (selected)16%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 91.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

23% percentile
025507510022.7% percentile
15.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos91.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 15.2%15.2%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 15.2%15.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 15.2%15.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 15.2%15.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 8.1%Loss Aversion: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos