Speaker summary
⁠74%1 analyzed article/video52.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sim Gill results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Pessimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 77.6% saturation with 45.768 hits. Analysis detected 188.972 faulty-reasoning hits from 52.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 42.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (11,355 of 28,364 speakers). This Sim Gill is worse (more manipulative) than 60.00% of the peer group.
Sim Gill
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 52.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

60% percentile
025507510060.0% percentile
42.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos52.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 77.6%77.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 43.6%43.6%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Speaker 43.6%43.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 43.6%43.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 52.9%52.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 27.9%27.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 27.9%27.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 21.5%21.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 77.6%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 52.9%, sitewide 19.2%Ad Hominem: Speaker 43.6%, sitewide 2.2%Horn Effect: Speaker 43.6%, sitewide 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 43.6%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 27.9%, sitewide 5.3%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 27.9%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 21.5%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos