Speaker summary
⁠60%1 analyzed article/video29 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sightline Institute results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization and Recency Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 29 hits. Analysis detected 87 faulty-reasoning hits from 29 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠87% (3,930 of 28,364 speakers). This Sightline Institute is worse (more manipulative) than 86.10% of the peer group.
Sightline Institute
Speaker details
Total words: 29
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

86% percentile
025507510086.1% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos29 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 8.1%Recency Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos