Speaker summary
⁠53%2 analyzed articles/videos297.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sierra Hellstrom results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Indoctrination, and Self-Serving Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 52% saturation with 198 hits. Analysis detected 617.858 faulty-reasoning hits from 297.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 21.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (18,024 of 27,710 speakers). This Sierra Hellstrom is better (less manipulative) than 65.00% of the peer group.
Sierra Hellstrom
Speaker details
Total words: 297.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

35% percentile
025507510035.0% percentile
21.7% BS Score2 analyzed videos297.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 52.0%52.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 18.1%18.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 16.8%16.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 25.5%25.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 19.1%19.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 12.9%12.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 13.3%13.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 16.3%16.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Anecdotal: Speaker 52.0%, sitewide 5.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 25.5%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 16.8%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 16.3%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 6.7%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos