Speaker summary
⁠88%1 analyzed article/video85.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sid Tenneti results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Hasty Generalization, and Self-Serving Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 70.2% saturation with 80 hits. Analysis detected 420.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 85.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 45% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (10,253 of 26,383 speakers). This Sid Tenneti is worse (more manipulative) than 61.10% of the peer group.
Sid Tenneti
Speaker details
Total words: 85.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

61% percentile
025507510061.1% percentile
45.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos85.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 70.2%70.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 59.6%59.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 64.9%64.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 40.4%40.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 29.8%29.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 20.2%20.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 20.2%20.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 70.2%, sitewide 0.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 64.9%, sitewide 6.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 59.6%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 40.4%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 29.8%, sitewide 6.0%Framing Effect: Speaker 20.2%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 20.2%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos