Speaker summary
⁠45%1 analyzed article/video84 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sid Shuman results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Bandwagon, Unattributed Quote, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 82.5% saturation with 104 hits. Analysis detected 334 faulty-reasoning hits from 84 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 44.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (11,021 of 28,364 speakers). This Sid Shuman is worse (more manipulative) than 61.10% of the peer group.
Sid Shuman
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 84
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

61% percentile
025507510061.1% percentile
44.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos84 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 82.5%82.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 32.5%32.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 32.5%32.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 17.5%17.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 82.5%, sitewide 11.1%Bandwagon: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 32.5%, sitewide 7.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 32.5%, sitewide 0.0%Framing Effect: Speaker 17.5%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos