Speaker summary
⁠40%1 analyzed article/video53.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shiomara Arce results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Anecdotal, and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 63.3% saturation with 62 hits. Analysis detected 164 faulty-reasoning hits from 53.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 23.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (17,444 of 28,364 speakers). This Shiomara Arce is better (less manipulative) than 61.50% of the peer group.
Shiomara Arce
Speaker details
Total words: 53.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

39% percentile
025507510038.5% percentile
23.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos53.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 63.3%63.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 32.6%32.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 16.3%16.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 18.4%18.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 18.4%18.4%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 9.2%9.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 9.2%9.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 63.3%, sitewide 15.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 32.6%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 18.4%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Speaker 18.4%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 16.3%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos