Speaker summary
⁠38%1 analyzed article/video156 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shin Kak-soo results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Status Quo Bias, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26.5% saturation with 62 hits. Analysis detected 301 faulty-reasoning hits from 156 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 17.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠27% (20,801 of 28,364 speakers). This Shin Kak-soo is better (less manipulative) than 73.30% of the peer group.
Shin Kak-soo
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 156
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

27% percentile
025507510026.7% percentile
17.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos156 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 25.6%25.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 25.6%25.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 13.3%13.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 13.7%13.7%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 13.7%13.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 12.8%12.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 26.5%26.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 12.8%12.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 10.3%10.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 26.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 25.6%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 25.6%, sitewide 8.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 6.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos