Speaker summary
⁠74%1 analyzed article/video45.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sherry Wohlgemuth results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Authority, and Self-Serving Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 89.7% saturation with 45.75 hits. Analysis detected 142.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 45.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 40.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (11,649 of 28,364 speakers). This Sherry Wohlgemuth is worse (more manipulative) than 58.90% of the peer group.
Sherry Wohlgemuth
Speaker details
Total words: 45.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

59% percentile
025507510058.9% percentile
40.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos45.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 89.7%89.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 55.9%55.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 29.4%29.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 20.6%20.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 29.4%29.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 20.6%20.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Optimism Bias: Speaker 89.7%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 55.9%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 29.4%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 29.4%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 20.6%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 20.6%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos