Speaker summary
⁠82%1 analyzed article/video28 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shaun Scott results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Loss Aversion, with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 83.3% saturation with 23.333 hits. Analysis detected 86.333 faulty-reasoning hits from 28 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 58.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (7,284 of 28,364 speakers). This Shaun Scott is worse (more manipulative) than 74.30% of the peer group.
Shaun Scott
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 28
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

74% percentile
025507510074.3% percentile
58.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos28 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 83.3%83.3%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%False Dilemma: Speaker 83.3%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 26.9%Loss Aversion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.5%False DilemmaSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos