Speaker summary
⁠72%1 analyzed article/video140 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shaul Magid results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 51.4% saturation with 72 hits. Analysis detected 158 faulty-reasoning hits from 140 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 37.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (12,445 of 28,364 speakers). This Shaul Magid is worse (more manipulative) than 56.10% of the peer group.
Shaul Magid
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 140
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

56% percentile
025507510056.1% percentile
37.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos140 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 38.6%38.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 51.4%51.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 22.9%22.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Speaker 51.4%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 38.6%, sitewide 2.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 22.9%, sitewide 5.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos