Speaker summary
⁠74%1 analyzed article/video53.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shannon Baker-Branstetter results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Straw Man, and Burden of Proof, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 80 hits. Analysis detected 325 faulty-reasoning hits from 53.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 67.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (6,030 of 28,364 speakers). This Shannon Baker-Branstetter is worse (more manipulative) than 78.70% of the peer group.
Shannon Baker-Branstetter
Speaker details
Total words: 53.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

79% percentile
025507510078.7% percentile
67.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos53.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 50.0%50.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Straw Man: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 15.9%Burden of Proof: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.4%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos