Speaker summary
⁠52%1 analyzed article/video392.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shane Martin results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Red Herring, Appeal to Authority, and Self-Serving Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 22.2% saturation with 126 hits. Analysis detected 725.842 faulty-reasoning hits from 392.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠11% (25,246 of 28,364 speakers). This Shane Martin is better (less manipulative) than 89.00% of the peer group.
Shane Martin
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 392.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

11% percentile
025507510011.0% percentile
9.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos392.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Speaker 17.4%17.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 11.3%11.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 17.7%17.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 12.3%12.3%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 8.6%8.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 22.2%22.2%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 6.3%6.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 9.8%9.8%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 5.3%5.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 14.1%14.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 22.2%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 17.7%, sitewide 3.7%Red Herring: Speaker 17.4%, sitewide 0.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 14.1%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 6.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 7.5%Primacy Effect: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 0.9%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 3.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos