Speaker summary
⁠88%1 analyzed article/video28 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shamlyan results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Personal Incredulity, and Anecdotal, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 31.5 hits. Analysis detected 185.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 28 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 68.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (5,980 of 28,364 speakers). This Shamlyan is worse (more manipulative) than 78.90% of the peer group.
Shamlyan
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 28
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

79% percentile
025507510078.9% percentile
68.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos28 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Personal IncredulitySitewide 0.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 50.0%50.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 8.1%Personal Incredulity: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.2%Anecdotal: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.2%Begging the Question: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos