Speaker summary
ā 60%1 analyzed article/video103.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shakil Barkat results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 52.5% saturation with 83 hits. Analysis detected 391 faulty-reasoning hits from 103.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 27.5% and a BS Rank of ā 45% (15,800 of 28,364 speakers). This Shakil Barkat is better (less manipulative) than 55.70% of the peer group.
Shakil Barkat
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
ā 0%Mike Muse1%
ā 0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
ā 45%Shakil Barkat (selected)28%
ā 100%4MATIV100%
ā 100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
ā 100%314 Action Fund100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 103.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

44% percentile
025507510044.3% percentile
27.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos103.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 52.5%52.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 31.0%31.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 27.2%27.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 20.3%20.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 20.3%20.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 21.5%21.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 20.3%20.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 27.2%27.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 27.2%27.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 52.5%, sitewide 11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 31.0%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 27.2%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 27.2%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Speaker 27.2%, sitewide 26.9%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 21.5%, sitewide 4.0%Optimism Bias: Speaker 20.3%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 20.3%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 20.3%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos