Speaker summary
⁠60%1 analyzed article/video70.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shakeel Hashim results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Biased Writer Voice, and Burden of Proof, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 94 hits. Analysis detected 329 faulty-reasoning hits from 70.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 58.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (7,283 of 28,364 speakers). This Shakeel Hashim is worse (more manipulative) than 74.30% of the peer group.
Shakeel Hashim
Speaker details
Total words: 70.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

74% percentile
025507510074.3% percentile
58.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos70.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Optimism Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.3%Burden of Proof: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.4%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos

Kimi: Threat or menace?⁠90%
TechCrunch⁠47%By Anthony Ha⁠57%7/18/2026, 11:51:07 AM