Speaker summary
⁠88%1 analyzed article/video45 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sgt. Brandon Veal results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 45 hits. Analysis detected 90 faulty-reasoning hits from 45 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 66.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (6,309 of 28,364 speakers). This Sgt. Brandon Veal is worse (more manipulative) than 77.80% of the peer group.
Sgt. Brandon Veal
Speaker details
Total words: 45
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

78% percentile
025507510077.8% percentile
66.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos45 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 64.4%64.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 35.6%35.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 64.4%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 35.6%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos