Speaker summary
⁠40%3 analyzed articles/videos256.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Senate Majority PAC results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 32% saturation with 79 hits. Analysis detected 372.778 faulty-reasoning hits from 256.667 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 14.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (22,195 of 28,364 speakers). This Senate Majority PAC is better (less manipulative) than 78.20% of the peer group.
Senate Majority PAC
Speaker details
Total words: 256.667
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

22% percentile
025507510021.8% percentile
14.7% BS Score3 analyzed videos256.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 32.0%32.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 18.6%18.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 11.7%11.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 6.9%6.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 12.1%12.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 6.8%6.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 10.5%10.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 21.5%21.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 12.1%12.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Ad Hominem: Speaker 32.0%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 21.5%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 18.6%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 8.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 0.8%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos