Speaker summary
⁠77%3 analyzed articles/videos34.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Senate Leadership Fund results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Ad Hominem, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 49.2% saturation with 29 hits. Analysis detected 77.973 faulty-reasoning hits from 34.333 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 41.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (11,471 of 28,364 speakers). This Senate Leadership Fund is worse (more manipulative) than 59.60% of the peer group.
Senate Leadership Fund
Speaker details
Total words: 34.333
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

60% percentile
025507510059.6% percentile
41.7% BS Score3 analyzed videos34.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 50.3%50.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 43.7%43.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 49.1%49.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 23.7%23.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Ad Hominem: Speaker 50.3%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 49.1%, sitewide 15.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 43.7%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 23.7%, sitewide 19.2%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos