Speaker summary
⁠74%1 analyzed article/video67.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Senada Adzem results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Availability Heuristic, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 86.3% saturation with 82 hits. Analysis detected 347.847 faulty-reasoning hits from 67.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 51.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (8,122 of 28,364 speakers). This Senada Adzem is worse (more manipulative) than 71.40% of the peer group.
Senada Adzem
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 67.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

71% percentile
025507510071.4% percentile
51.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos67.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 86.3%86.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 56.8%56.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 43.2%43.2%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 43.2%43.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 43.2%43.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 24.1%24.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 13.7%13.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Anecdotal: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 86.3%, sitewide 3.7%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 56.8%, sitewide 9.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 43.2%, sitewide 0.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 43.2%, sitewide 8.1%Recency Bias: Speaker 43.2%, sitewide 2.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 24.1%, sitewide 7.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 0.0%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos