Speaker summary
⁠67%1 analyzed article/video30 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sen. Ruben Gallego results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 53.3% saturation with 16 hits. Analysis detected 48 faulty-reasoning hits from 30 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 53.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (7,873 of 28,364 speakers). This Sen. Ruben Gallego is worse (more manipulative) than 72.20% of the peer group.
Sen. Ruben Gallego
Speaker details
Total words: 30
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

72% percentile
025507510072.2% percentile
53.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos30 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 53.3%53.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 53.3%53.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 53.3%53.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 53.3%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 53.3%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 53.3%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos