Speaker summary
⁠42%1 analyzed article/video131.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sebastian Kruss results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Hasty Generalization, and Recency Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 60.8% saturation with 90 hits. Analysis detected 189 faulty-reasoning hits from 131.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 31.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (14,202 of 28,364 speakers). This Sebastian Kruss is better (less manipulative) than 50.10% of the peer group.
Sebastian Kruss
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠50%Sebastian Kruss (selected)32%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 131.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

50% percentile
025507510049.9% percentile
31.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos131.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 60.8%60.8%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 22.3%22.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 22.3%22.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 22.3%22.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Optimism Bias: Speaker 60.8%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 22.3%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 22.3%, sitewide 8.1%Recency Bias: Speaker 22.3%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos