Speaker summary
⁠48%1 analyzed article/video170 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sean Tarwater results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Anecdotal, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 22.6% saturation with 50 hits. Analysis detected 253 faulty-reasoning hits from 170 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 14.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠21% (22,446 of 28,364 speakers). This Sean Tarwater is better (less manipulative) than 79.10% of the peer group.
Sean Tarwater
Speaker details
Total words: 170
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

21% percentile
025507510020.9% percentile
14.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos170 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 22.6%22.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 20.8%20.8%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 13.6%13.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 11.8%11.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 13.6%13.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 8.6%8.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 11.8%11.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 11.8%11.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 22.6%, sitewide 4.6%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 20.8%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos