Speaker summary
67%1 analyzed article/video395 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Scott Wolfe results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Anecdotal, and Pessimism Bias, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 26.9% saturation with 146 hits. Analysis detected 712.352 faulty-reasoning hits from 395 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.1% and a BS Rank of 8% (26,247 of 28,364 speakers). This Scott Wolfe is better (less manipulative) than 92.50% of the peer group.
Scott Wolfe
Speaker details
Total words: 395
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

8% percentile
02550751007.5% percentile
8.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos395 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 6.2%6.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 26.9%26.9%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 12.5%12.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 12.6%12.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 9.0%9.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 1.7%1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 8.9%8.9%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 5.7%5.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 9.4%9.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 12.1%12.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 26.9%, sitewide 9.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 15.9%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 1.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 0.8%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 7.5%Burden of Proof: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 0.4%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos