Speaker summary
⁠88%2 analyzed articles/videos37 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Scott Tong results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 70.3% saturation with 26 hits. Analysis detected 63 faulty-reasoning hits from 37 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 56.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (7,123 of 26,780 speakers). This Scott Tong is worse (more manipulative) than 73.40% of the peer group.
Scott Tong
Speaker details
Total words: 37
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

73% percentile
025507510073.4% percentile
56.8% BS Score2 analyzed videos37 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 70.3%70.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 70.3%70.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 29.7%29.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 70.3%, sitewide 11.1%Recency Bias: Speaker 70.3%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 29.7%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos