Speaker summary
⁠51%3 analyzed articles/videos87.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Scott Peters results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Quote-first Misdirection, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 40.6% saturation with 39 hits. Analysis detected 96.42 faulty-reasoning hits from 87.333 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 29.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (15,174 of 28,364 speakers). This Scott Peters is better (less manipulative) than 53.50% of the peer group.
Scott Peters
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 87.333
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

47% percentile
025507510046.5% percentile
29.1% BS Score3 analyzed videos87.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 28.6%28.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 33.0%33.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 40.6%40.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 14.3%14.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 40.6%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 33.0%, sitewide 6.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 28.6%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 11.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos