Speaker summary
⁠45%1 analyzed article/video24.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Scott Laster results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic and Appeal to Emotion, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 48 hits. Analysis detected 118 faulty-reasoning hits from 24.333 analyzed words across 1 video, generating a BS Score of 81.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (5,108 of 28,364 speakers). This Scott Laster is worse (more manipulative) than 82.00% of the peer group.
Scott Laster
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 24.333
Video count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

82% percentile
025507510082.0% percentile
81.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos24.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 45.8%45.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Anecdotal: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 45.8%, sitewide 15.9%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos