Speaker summary
⁠88%1 analyzed article/video36 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Saura Jost results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma and Middle Ground, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 36 hits. Analysis detected 72 faulty-reasoning hits from 36 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 66.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (6,304 of 28,364 speakers). This Saura Jost is worse (more manipulative) than 77.80% of the peer group.
Saura Jost
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 36
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

78% percentile
025507510077.8% percentile
66.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos36 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Middle GroundSitewide 0.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.5%Middle Ground: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos