Speaker summary
⁠77%1 analyzed article/video121 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sasha Renee Perez results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Loss Aversion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 61.6% saturation with 85.285 hits. Analysis detected 349.598 faulty-reasoning hits from 121 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 32.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (12,888 of 25,906 speakers). This Sasha Renee Perez is worse (more manipulative) than 50.30% of the peer group.
Sasha Renee Perez
Speaker details
Total words: 121
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

50% percentile
025507510050.3% percentile
32.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos121 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 46.5%46.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 57.2%57.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 61.6%61.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 46.0%46.0%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 22.1%22.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 9.8%9.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 9.8%9.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 9.8%9.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Speaker 61.6%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 57.2%, sitewide 15.9%Loss Aversion: Speaker 46.5%, sitewide 2.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 46.0%, sitewide 19.2%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 22.1%, sitewide 0.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 8.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos