Speaker summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video78.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sarah Kreps results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Quote-first Misdirection, and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 74.6% saturation with 66 hits. Analysis detected 294.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 78.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 35.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (12,265 of 26,731 speakers). This Sarah Kreps is worse (more manipulative) than 54.10% of the peer group.
Sarah Kreps
Speaker details
Total words: 78.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

54% percentile
025507510054.1% percentile
35.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos78.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 74.6%74.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 37.3%37.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 37.3%37.3%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 37.7%37.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 37.7%37.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 37.3%37.3%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Speaker 12.7%12.7%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 12.7%12.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 74.6%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 37.7%, sitewide 8.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 37.7%, sitewide 1.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 37.3%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 37.3%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 37.3%, sitewide 1.1%Composition/Division: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos