Speaker summary
⁠81%1 analyzed article/video77.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sarah Brubeck Schnurbusch results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Anecdotal, and Confirmation Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 67.2% saturation with 52 hits. Analysis detected 206.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 77.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 30.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (14,544 of 28,364 speakers). This Sarah Brubeck Schnurbusch is better (less manipulative) than 51.30% of the peer group.
Sarah Brubeck Schnurbusch
Speaker details
Total words: 77.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

49% percentile
025507510048.7% percentile
30.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos77.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 67.2%67.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 44.4%44.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 37.1%37.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 25.9%25.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 19.4%19.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 11.2%11.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 11.2%11.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Halo Effect: Speaker 67.2%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 44.4%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 37.1%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 25.9%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 19.4%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 6.0%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos