Speaker summary
⁠60%1 analyzed article/video118 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sara Ravitch results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Loss Aversion, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 40.7% saturation with 48 hits. Analysis detected 166 faulty-reasoning hits from 118 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 23.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (17,650 of 28,364 speakers). This Sara Ravitch is better (less manipulative) than 62.20% of the peer group.
Sara Ravitch
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 118
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

38% percentile
025507510037.8% percentile
23.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos118 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 40.7%40.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 40.7%40.7%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 17.8%17.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 22.9%22.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 9.3%9.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 9.3%9.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 40.7%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 40.7%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 22.9%, sitewide 8.1%Loss Aversion: Speaker 17.8%, sitewide 2.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos