Speaker summary
⁠79%1 analyzed article/video25.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sara Narcross results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Halo Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 19.125 hits. Analysis detected 87.125 faulty-reasoning hits from 25.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 55% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (7,681 of 28,364 speakers). This Sara Narcross is worse (more manipulative) than 72.90% of the peer group.
Sara Narcross
Speaker details
Total words: 25.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

73% percentile
025507510072.9% percentile
55.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos25.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos