Speaker summary
⁠81%2 analyzed articles/videos39 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sandra Day O'Connor results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Framing Effect, and Loss Aversion, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 57.7% saturation with 41 hits. Analysis detected 185 faulty-reasoning hits from 39 analyzed words across 2 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 75.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (5,314 of 28,698 speakers). This Sandra Day O'Connor is worse (more manipulative) than 81.50% of the peer group.
Sandra Day O'Connor
Speaker details
Total words: 39
Content count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

82% percentile
025507510081.5% percentile
75.9% BS Score2 analyzed videos39 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 57.8%57.8%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 57.8%57.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 57.8%57.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 57.8%57.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 57.8%, sitewide 15.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 57.8%, sitewide 1.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 57.8%, sitewide 26.9%Loss Aversion: Speaker 57.8%, sitewide 2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos