Speaker summary
⁠88%1 analyzed article/video33 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sandra Alvarado results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Confirmation Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 33 hits. Analysis detected 33 faulty-reasoning hits from 33 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠87% (3,756 of 28,364 speakers). This Sandra Alvarado is worse (more manipulative) than 86.80% of the peer group.
Sandra Alvarado
Speaker details
Total words: 33
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

87% percentile
025507510086.8% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos33 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 7.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos