Speaker summary
⁠88%1 analyzed article/video48 analyzed words
BS Summary: These San Francisco Human Services Agency results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 48 hits. Analysis detected 192 faulty-reasoning hits from 48 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠87% (3,766 of 28,364 speakers). This San Francisco Human Services Agency is worse (more manipulative) than 86.70% of the peer group.
San Francisco Human Services Agency
Speaker details
Total words: 48
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

87% percentile
025507510086.7% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos48 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Anecdotal: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos