Speaker summary
⁠37%1 analyzed article/video61 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Samara Minkin results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic and In-Group Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 20.2% saturation with 19 hits. Analysis detected 47 faulty-reasoning hits from 61 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 16.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (21,050 of 28,326 speakers). This Samara Minkin is better (less manipulative) than 74.30% of the peer group.
Samara Minkin
Speaker details
Total words: 61
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

26% percentile
025507510025.7% percentile
16.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos61 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 20.2%20.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 18.1%18.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 11.7%11.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Optimism Bias: Speaker 20.2%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos