Speaker summary
⁠79%2 analyzed articles/videos103.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sam Whitehead results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 44.4% saturation with 45.924 hits. Analysis detected 162.924 faulty-reasoning hits from 103.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 21.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (18,309 of 28,364 speakers). This Sam Whitehead is better (less manipulative) than 64.50% of the peer group.
Sam Whitehead
Speaker details
Total words: 103.5
Article count: 2
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

36% percentile
025507510035.5% percentile
21.9% BS Score2 analyzed videos103.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 44.4%44.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 20.4%20.4%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 12.9%12.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 18.3%18.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 12.9%12.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 12.9%12.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 31.7%31.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Speaker 44.4%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 31.7%, sitewide 26.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 20.4%, sitewide 0.8%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 18.3%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos