Speaker summary
⁠78%4 analyzed articles/videos1,013.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sam Vinograd results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 25.5% saturation with 243.234 hits. Analysis detected 1,898.027 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,013.667 analyzed words across 4 videos, generating a BS Score of 6.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠5% (26,993 of 28,364 speakers). This Sam Vinograd is better (less manipulative) than 95.20% of the peer group.
Sam Vinograd
Speaker details
Total words: 1,013.667
Video count: 4
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

5% percentile
02550751004.8% percentile
6.6% BS Score4 analyzed videos1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 25.5%25.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 13.8%13.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 6.4%6.4%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 11.3%11.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 1.9%1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 12.1%12.1%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 9.5%9.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 15.8%15.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 8.4%8.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 25.5%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 15.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 2.5%Slippery Slope: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 1.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 6.0%Composition/Division: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 0.6%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 0.3%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos