Speaker summary
⁠65%1 analyzed article/video49.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sam Kash results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Overconfidence Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 74 hits. Analysis detected 158.125 faulty-reasoning hits from 49.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 45.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (10,816 of 28,364 speakers). This Sam Kash is worse (more manipulative) than 61.90% of the peer group.
Sam Kash
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 49.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

62% percentile
025507510061.9% percentile
45.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos49.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 50.7%50.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 24.3%24.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 25.7%25.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 25.7%25.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Anecdotal: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 50.7%, sitewide 9.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 25.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 25.7%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 24.3%, sitewide 0.0%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos