Speaker summary
⁠72%1 analyzed article/video94.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sam Fankuchen results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including No True Scotsman, Halo Effect, and Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 64.3% saturation with 70.064 hits. Analysis detected 250.198 faulty-reasoning hits from 94.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 25.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (16,598 of 28,364 speakers). This Sam Fankuchen is better (less manipulative) than 58.50% of the peer group.
Sam Fankuchen
Speaker details
Total words: 94.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

42% percentile
025507510041.5% percentile
25.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos94.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 64.3%64.3%No True ScotsmanSitewide 0.1%Speaker 32.7%32.7%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 29.9%29.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 31.8%31.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 16.4%16.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 9.8%9.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 9.8%9.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 9.8%9.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 64.3%, sitewide 8.1%No True Scotsman: Speaker 32.7%, sitewide 0.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 31.8%, sitewide 6.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 29.9%, sitewide 3.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 16.4%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos