Speaker summary
⁠60%1 analyzed article/video80 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sam Eagan results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 60 hits. Analysis detected 120 faulty-reasoning hits from 80 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 75% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (5,480 of 27,811 speakers). This Sam Eagan is worse (more manipulative) than 80.30% of the peer group.
Sam Eagan
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 80
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

80% percentile
025507510080.3% percentile
75.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos80 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos