Speaker summary
88%1 analyzed article/video37 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sally Hindman results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Biased Writer Voice, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 37 hits. Analysis detected 37 faulty-reasoning hits from 37 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 87% (3,730 of 28,364 speakers). This Sally Hindman is worse (more manipulative) than 86.90% of the peer group.
Sally Hindman
Speaker details
Ranking context
Position among analyzed speakers
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos37 analyzed words
Reasoning profile
Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
Sitewide departure map
Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often