Speaker summary
⁠88%1 analyzed article/video48 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Salahuddin Ahmed results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Horn Effect, and In-Group Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 72 hits. Analysis detected 228 faulty-reasoning hits from 48 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 80% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (5,171 of 28,364 speakers). This Salahuddin Ahmed is worse (more manipulative) than 81.80% of the peer group.
Salahuddin Ahmed
Speaker details
Total words: 48
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

82% percentile
025507510081.8% percentile
80.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos48 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.2%Horn Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.0%In-Group Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos