Speaker summary
⁠45%1 analyzed article/video56 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sahar Zaraatgar results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, In-Group Bias, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 84 hits. Analysis detected 210 faulty-reasoning hits from 56 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 62.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (6,798 of 28,364 speakers). This Sahar Zaraatgar is worse (more manipulative) than 76.00% of the peer group.
Sahar Zaraatgar
Speaker details
Total words: 56
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

76% percentile
025507510076.0% percentile
62.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos56 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos