Speaker summary
33%7 analyzed articles/videos61.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sahan Journal results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Burden of Proof, Confirmation Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 48.5% saturation with 80 hits. Analysis detected 186 faulty-reasoning hits from 61.333 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 22.5% and a BS Rank of 37% (18,025 of 28,364 speakers). This Sahan Journal is better (less manipulative) than 63.50% of the peer group.
Sahan Journal
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

37% percentile
025507510036.5% percentile
22.5% BS Score7 analyzed videos61.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 48.5%48.5%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 20.6%20.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 20.6%20.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 12.7%12.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 10.3%10.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 48.5%, sitewide 11.1%Burden of Proof: Speaker 20.6%, sitewide 0.4%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 20.6%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 19.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate